Street Sense wins Kentucky Derby

Saturday, May 5, 2007

Street Sense cruised to a 2 1/4 length victory in the 133rd Kentucky Derby on Saturday. Ridden by jockey Calvin Borel, Street Sense is the first Breeders’ Cup Juvenile winner to capture the Kentucky Derby, and the colt is the 3rd post-time favorite in the last 7 years to win the Derby, the last two being Fusaichi Pegasus in 2000 and Smarty Jones in 2004.

The second place finisher in this year’s race was Hard Spun. The colt almost got away with running the Derby with a leading position from the starting gate to the finishing wire.

Hard Spun led until the 1-mile mark when Street Sense passed him. The third place finisher, Curlin, made an attempt to be the first Kentucky Derby winner to have not raced as a 2-year-old, something not done in over 120 years plus. He also closed well enough, but could not overtake Hard Spun in the end.

Street Sense went off as the near 5-1 favorite and paid $11.80 to win. The $2 exacta (7-8) paid $101.80, the $1 trifecta (7-8-2) paid $220, and the $1 superfecta (7-8-2-5) paid $14,523.20 with longshot Imawildandcrazyguy in 4th at 28-1. The top three finishers are expected to race in the second leg of the Triple Crown of horse racing at the Preakness in Baltimore, Maryland on Saturday, May 19.

Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom, a horse racing fan herself, was a spectator at the 133rd running of the Derby. Her visit to the U.S. also included a visit to Jamestown, Virginia for a celebration marking the 400th anniversary of colonization of the Americas. Jockey Borel has been invited to a white tie dinner at the White House on Monday with President Bush and the Queen.

Wikipedia has more about this subject:

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Street_Sense_wins_Kentucky_Derby&oldid=441669”

UK Wikinews Shorts: July 8, 2013

A compilation of brief news reports for Monday, July 8, 2013.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=UK_Wikinews_Shorts:_July_8,_2013&oldid=1981592”

Study: Taste of beer causes chemical reward in male brain

Tuesday, April 16, 2013

In a study published yesterday online in the journal Neuropsychopharmacology, scientists from the Indiana University School of Medicine say the taste of beer alone triggers a release of dopamine, the brain’s chemical reward signal.

Dopamine is a chemical released by the human body and is associated with drug- and alcohol-related use and pleasure. In men with family histories of alcoholism, the dopamine release was greater.

The scientists sprayed 15 milliliters (about one tablespoon) of either beer or a sports drink into the mouths of the participants over a period of 15 minutes, scanning their brains and noting increases in dopamine levels were present. According to the scientists, 15 mL of beer does not contain enough alcohol for the alcohol to cause intoxication or any noticeable increase in blood-alcohol levels.

Brain scans were accomplished with positron emission tomography, an imaging technology using radiation to obtain three-dimensional images of, in this case, the human brain.

The senior author of the study, Dr. David A. Kareken, said “We believe this is the first experiment in humans to show that the taste of an alcoholic drink alone, without any intoxicating effect from the alcohol, can elicit this dopamine activity in the brain’s reward centers”.

Professor of substance use, policy and practice Peter Anderson at Newcastle University in the UK said many “sorts of cues” can cause an urge to drink. “This paper demonstrates that taste alone impacts on the brain functions associated with desire. This is not surprising — if taste increases desire, it has to impact on brain functions.”

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Study:_Taste_of_beer_causes_chemical_reward_in_male_brain&oldid=4629300”

Vacation Rentals In Huddleston Va: Vacation Rentals Tips

byAlma Abell

After working and stressing for the better part of the year, nothing would be more relaxing than going for a vacation. If you have a family with kids, renting a vacation house will be better compared to renting a hotel room. Hotel rooms not only have limited space but they are also more expensive compared to vacation houses. A vacation home will feel more like a home. Vacation Rentals in Huddleston VA tips you on how you can get a good rental home.

Research

You might have decided to go for a vacation outside your country or continent. In this case, you should take time in choosing the best one for you. Find out through others who might have gone to that particular place and inquire about the rentals they might have used. If nobody has the information you need, you can find out more information online about the vacation house you desire. Taking your time ensures that you make the correct choice and you do not end up in a place that will ruin your vacation. It also saves you the extra cost you would go through if you paid for a substandard place and had to upgrade.

Sign papers before you pay

Paying for your vacation home before reading the paperwork can have serious consequences. Before paying them, ensure that you have read and understood the agreement. Where you are not satisfied, ask them questions till you see the logic in all that is stated on the agreement. You should know what would happen if you pay and your vacation is canceled or you leave before it ends.

Huddleston Vacation Rentals, ensures that you enjoy your vacation to the maximum. Your home away from home stay will be a vacation to remember for years to come. For more information, visit the website

Know the details

Make sure you know all that is included in the money you pay. Some Advertise low prices just to attract customers but once you are in, you notice that the price was not inclusive many things. Therefore make sure you ask them if what they are charging is inclusive electricity bills, water bills or any other thing. Ask them about any hidden charges that might not have been included in the agreement.

Visit RSI Rentals Inc for more details.

Man killed after shop robbery in West Yorkshire, England; murder investigation launched

Sunday, February 21, 2010

A man has died after being involved in a robbery of his shop in West Yorkshire, England. Four youngsters, described as wearing hooded jumpers and tracksuit trousers, raided the Cowcliffe Convenience Store in the town of Huddersfield at approximately 2030 GMT on Saturday.

63-year-old Gurmail Singh sustained head injuries as a result of the robbery. Six witnesses attempted to prevent the youths from exiting the shop but failed, and the teenagers managed to escape with confectionary, cigarettes and money. One witness claimed to see a hammer in posession of one of the offenders, however it is unknown if this was used in the attack.

Singh was taken to Huddersfield Royal Infirmary but died there at approximately 0330 GMT on Sunday. West Yorkshire Police have now launched an investigation into the death of Gurmail Singh. A post-mortem examination is scheduled to take place on Monday to attempt to discover how the shop-owner was killed. West Yorkshire Police are now appealing for witnesses or anyone who has information in relation to this incident to contact them.

Contact West Yorkshire Police on 0845 6060606 and ask for the Huddersfield help desk if you have any information regarding this incident.
 This story has updates See Three people arrested in connection with murder of shop owner in West Yorkshire, England 

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Man_killed_after_shop_robbery_in_West_Yorkshire,_England;_murder_investigation_launched&oldid=3358784”

New York executive files $60 million libel lawsuit over insurance scandal

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

A former Marsh & McLennan Cos. executive has hit former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer with a $60 million defamation lawsuit over an online magazine article regarding an insurance bid-rigging scandal.

William Gilman, a former Marsh managing director, filed a complaint last Friday in the U.S. District Court in Manhattan, over allegations Mr. Spitzer defamed him in a Slate article published a year ago. A copy of the complaint was made public on Monday.

Gilman, who had a final insurance fraud charge dismissed in January, said Spitzer acted with “actual malice” by suggesting that he was guilty of crimes of which he was never accused.

Although he wasn’t named in the article, Mr. Gilman complained that Spitzer defamed him by writing that “Marsh’s behavior was a blatant abuse of law and market power: price-fixing, bid-rigging and kickbacks all designed to harm their customers and the market while Marsh and its employees pocketed the increased fees and kickbacks.”

“While Mr. Spitzer’s statements do not refer to Mr. Gilman by name, Mr. Gilman is readily identifiable as the subject of the defamatory comments,” said the complaint. “Mr. Spitzer was well aware of his own allegations as attorney general and the resolution of those allegations in favor of Mr. Gilman and yet, recklessly disregarded these facts.”

In 2004 Mr. Spizter, then the state’s Attorney General, announced an investigation into the practices at Marsh & McLennan, particularly fees paid by insures to brokers who place business with them. Gilman, who worked for the company at the time, was charged in 2005 with 37 counts of insurance fraud. Gilman’s final charge was dropped last January.

“I haven’t seen the lawsuit and so will not comment on it,” said Spitzer. “The illegalities rampant at Marsh & McLennan leading to their fine of $850 million and the multiple judicial findings of illegality are clear from the public record.”

Mr. Gilman is now seeking at least $10 million in compensatory damages; $20 million in general damages, including damage to his reputation; and $30 million in punitive damages.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=New_York_executive_files_$60_million_libel_lawsuit_over_insurance_scandal&oldid=1280282”

Understand The Health Insurance Subsidy

Submitted by: Dennis Jarvis

The whole health subsidy change is new to American and most people. There are many questions on how it works and whether a person is eligible. Your answers are below! Keep in mind that the health reform bill which created the health subsidies is 1000’s of pages….none of them easy or fun to read. Our goal at

HealthSubsidy.net

is to take all that information and simplify it so that real people can understand their options. A quick lay of the land. On this page, we’ll hit the big ticket items that touch on the health subsidy universe with links to additional detail on each topic. Let’s get into it!

Eligibility

In general, the subsidy will be available for individuals and families (not through group health insurance) who are citizens of the United States. There are three important considerations to look at in terms of eligibility. There other constraints and rules (it was a product of Congress after all) but these are the big three.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOBuAe1IVRM[/youtube]

Up to 400% of the Federal Poverty Level

The subsidies are designed to help people afford health insurance for those that make up to 400% of the Federal Poverty Level. You can access those numbers here and the qualification will have a look back period. For example, 2013 income will drive 2014 eligibility. Below between 133% and 150% of the FPL, you may qualify for no cost Medicaid depending on your State. From that baseline up to 400% of the FPL, you will likely be eligible for a health subsidy. Above 400% of poverty, there will be NO subsidy. More detail on the 400% Rule

How much Health Subsidy can you Expect

9.5% of your income becomes a factor

So let’s say you qualify based on the 400% Rule of the FPL? How much will you receive. There’s two considerations here. First, how much is the underlying health insurance plan premium itself. This is driven by your age, area, and family make up. The second factor is the 9.5% Rule. Basically, the law states that you shouldn’t have to pay more than 9.5% of your MAGI (Marginal Adjusted Gross Income) towards health insurance. For example, if you make $1000 monthly in MAGI, your health insurance shouldn’t be more than $95/monthly. If your health insurance is $400/monthly, your expected subsidy would be $305/monthly or more than $3600 annually. We recommend using our Health Subsidy Calculator (props out to Kaiser Foundation) for an estimate and the Health Subsidy Quoting page will show actual numbers starting Oct 1st 2013.

How will the health subsidy actually work

Keep in mind that there may be differences by State but the health subsidy is expected to process this way. You will run your quote through our Partner (eff Oct 1st 2013). Part of this process will ask for income information. The system will automatically determine whether you qualify for a health subsidy and show the net premium by plan. You can then apply for coverage right through our Quoting partner and you will only pay the net difference. The health subsidy is all handled automatically starting the first month that you actually have the coverage. There may be some tax time considerations if your income increased or dropped significantly (the 400% and 9.5% rule above) but the process is fairly automated. That’s great news!

Which plans can you enroll in with the Subsidy

The health subsidy will be based on the Silver Metallic plan (see Health Exchange plans and Metallic plans). Each State will have different options to qualify with the subsidy which you can find in our Health Subsidy Quote page when the Exchange is live (Oct 1st 2013). If you qualify for a subsidy, there will be very little reason not to get a qualified Exchange plan. If you do not qualify for a subsidy, you’re best options will likely be off the Exchange or to keep your Grandfathered plan (a plan unchanged with effective date prior to 10/23/2010). More detail on Exchange Plans and Grandfathered Plans.

About the Author: Dennis Jarvis is a licensed health insurance agent who focuses on helping people understand the new

health subsidy

available through Reform for healthcare. More info on

Understanding health subsidy

Source:

isnare.com

Permanent Link:

isnare.com/?aid=1835122&ca=Finances

Hundreds of thousands of British public sector workers strike over planned pension changes

Friday, July 1, 2011

Hundreds of thousands of British public sector workers went on strike across the country yesterday to protest planned changes to pensions. As industrial action swept the country, half of all schools were hit when teachers walked out, thousands of emergency service responders did not arrive at work, and there were warnings of immigration delays at Heathrow airport.

Police arrested 26 people as protesters picketed on a march in London, and riot police kettled demonstrators as clashes broke out. Reports vary, but it is thought that up to half of British state schools have been affected as employees did not turn up to work.

Mark Serwotka, the leader of the Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS), said the strikes would serve as a “wake-up call” to the coalition government. “It’s a very, very clear signal to the government that they have been rumbled,” Serwotka said. “This is not about pensions, this is about making public sector workers pay for the economic problems, and we are determined to keep going until they change direction.”

Government officials condemned the strike and said the planned changes to pensions, which would see teachers work until age 68 and get less from their pensions, were “fair to taxpayers” as Britain attempts to deal with a large budget deficit. A spokesperson for Downing Street insisted the strike was having a “minimal” impact and said the turnout suggested many public sector workers supported the pension changes.

Christine Blower, the general secretary of one of the striking unions, the National Union of Teachers (NUT), said the strike demonstrated “the anger and distress that this government is causing teachers.” She said the “unjustified attacks” on the pensions of teachers “are nothing short of disgraceful.” Speaking on BBC television programme Question Time, she added: “Much of this has already been imposed on teachers without negotiation, and when we say there are talks going on it’s perfectly true that the government is talking but it isn’t actually listening.”

But despite government claims that the strike was having little impact, 5,679 schools were closed and another 4,999 were affected as teachers did not turn up for work. Michael Gove, the education secretary attacked the walkouts as “disappointing and unnecessary”. Thousands of staff handling emergency 999 calls also striked and pickets were held outside courts as members of the PCS walked out in protest.

This is not about pensions, this is about making public sector workers pay for the economic problems, and we are determined to keep going until they change direction.

Francis Maude, the cabinet office minister, also maintained that the strikes were wrong and said the low number of people walking out showed many supported the government’s plans. “What today has shown is that the vast majority of hard-working public sector employees do not support today’s premature strike and have come into work today,” he said.

Senior Labour party figures including Ed Miliband, Tessa Jowell and John Denham said the strikes were unjustified until negotiations with the government had concluded. Mary Bousted of the NUT criticised Labour’s lack of support for the striking workers: “The response of Ed Miliband has been a disgrace – he should be ashamed of himself. If our strike is a mistake, what has he done to oppose this devastating attack on our pensions? If the opposition will not defend our pensions, we will.”

A largely peaceful march by 30,000 protesters took place through London, and the atmosphere was reported to be largely peaceful, but Metropolitan Police officials said 26 people had been arrested. At a meeting in Westminister, many left wing figures attacked the government plans. Ken Livingstone, a former mayor of London who is running for the job again next year, said the coalition government had “mishandled” the issue of pensions. “The government must end its attacks and negotiate on the core issues under contention,” he added.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Hundreds_of_thousands_of_British_public_sector_workers_strike_over_planned_pension_changes&oldid=4577506”

5 Top Frequently Asked Questions About

5 Top Frequently Asked Questions about by Dr Leon AnafHave you ever noticed many people suffering from overbite or underbite never undergo the treatment to rectify their dental issue? The main reason why they never undergo the brace treatment is they don’t like the way the brace look. For those patients, invisible brace treatment is a boon. The invisible braces cannot be noticed by anyone so that you can feel very comfortable wearing it even when you are going out of your home. Initially, your dentist will create a unique set of aligners for your teeth. You need to wear the new set of aligner every two weeks to get some improvement in your teeth. When you replace the new set of aligners every two weeks, your teeth will move little by little each week, and at last, you can get the desired result with the help of invisible braces. Most people have many questions regarding the invisible brace treatment, and few of those questions are answered in this article.How do the invisible braces work?Once your dentist takes the 3D image of your teeth, they will prepare a series of custom-made aligners used to treat your specific dental issue. A series of aligners are made since you need to change the aligner every two weeks to get the best result. How do invisible braces look like?Aligners are transparent, invisible braces that are custom-made to fit your teeth. These custom-made aligners are used to move your teeth to get the desired output. Will invisible brace affect my speech?Initially, you may feel it little discomfort while speaking. But, when you get used to the braces, you can speak without any discomfort. So the cheap invisible braces have no negative impact or permanent changes in your speech. Is the invisible brace treatment painful?Each time when you are changing the old aligner and switching to the new set of aligners, you may feel a temporary discomfort that may change within two or three days. The discomfort is the good sign that the treatment is working. How often should I wear the brace?Invisible brace treatment works only if you wear the aligner daily. It is recommended to wear the invisible braces the whole day except during eating, brushing and flossing your teeth. As the invisible braces cost is affordable and it offers various benefits over traditional metal braces, most people prefer the invisible brace treatment to correct their issues such as overbite, underbite, gapped teeth, and more. The author of this article is a dentist who specialises in offering high-quality invisible braces treatment to his patients. In this article, he has mentioned few frequently asked questions about cheap invisible braces. To know more, visit costofbraces.com.auArticle Source: eArticlesOnline.com

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2tR76dkWF8[/youtube]

James Brown dies of pneumonia

Monday, December 25, 2006

James Brown, often referred to as the Godfather of Soul, died in Atlanta due to congestive heart failure, combined with pneumonia. His death at age 73 was announced by his agent. After his dentist noticed something unusual with him, Brown was told to visit a doctor immediately. He was taken into the hospital yesterday for treatment of his pneumonia until his death at around 1:45 AM (6:45 AM GMT). It is not known whether he received a pneumonia vaccination, as recommended for people of his age.

He was born in 1933 and grew up in poverty until he formed James Brown & The Famous Flames. His influence on 20th century music, from funk to hip hop was profound.

Before he died, he scheduled a New Year’s Eve concert series in New Jersey and New York that would help kick off a 2007 tour.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=James_Brown_dies_of_pneumonia&oldid=4462705”